Thread
| Can a Moderator .. jharrison 31 Jan 10 6:37PM | Thread Closed |
... please remove the abusive, and somewhat deranged comments from my poem I-Volutionary.
Thanks.
|
| re: Can a Moderator .. jharrison 31 Jan 10 6:41PM | Thread Closed |
The comment that includes these two very strange lines ..
"under the new sn of jharrison so as to appear male
to avoid potential misogynistic criticisms"
Apparently I am using the sig name of "jharrison" to appear male, to "avoid potential misogynistic criticisms" ..
|
|---|
| re: Can a Moderator .. DeformedLion 31 Jan 10 8:19PM | Thread Closed |
that's pretty funny though.
|
| re: Can a Moderator .. R_Reid_Welch 31 Jan 10 9:30PM | Thread Closed |
whatever,,,,
it was not myself who erased that comment, nor placed it... I never even read the poem or its list until about twenty minutes ago.
The offensive, troll-attack posting that jh quoted in part; it was already GONE.
So, being there, I read her poem.
It's suercalifragilistic x pee allic doe shush!
(it got a ten from myself, plus a commentary)
http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/61122/
Yep, there is one fine poem.
I never saw the offensive, troll-attact commentary;
one of our mods was on the ball, and fast.
So all I got to see was the damned-good poem!
Shite! I was hoping to see some dirty troll commentary and
be able to beat up on some troll.
Oh well, better luck for myself next time?
Anyone want to slander any of my short poem list?
Go on...you just want your ISP blocked, don't ya, TROLL, who tried to upset]
jharrison.
EAT ME, troll!
r.
|
|---|
| Now the vers squirms: R_Reid_Welch 31 Jan 10 9:33PM | Thread Closed |
Stinkweid here again.
OK. So I did a poem crit!
I saw no bad commentary, as a mod had already erased a troll attack.
IN RETURN, I do now respectfully request that every PC member award
http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/60825/
with ten after ten after ten...no crits needed. The item is perfectly....
PUCKISH!@!@*!^R#@!
ha ha!
Reid (eat my ambergris, anyone :)
|
| notice ever, how a ver turns upon itself..itself being: R_Reid_Welch 31 Jan 10 9:38PM | Thread Closed |
it is worth major money and is
Parfum, the Poem a key ingredient of Chanel N°5
~~~~~~~~~~earth worm trailings~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
please to read =her= work,
I-VOLUTIONARY:
http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/61122/
t.y.
r.
|
|---|
| re: Now the vers squirms: billy423uk 31 Jan 10 11:20PM | Thread Closed |
actually it was reposted. originally i gave it a 7 i think, and a comment. now it just get a 4. next time i'll give it a 3.
and no comment
> Stinkweid here again.
>
> OK. So I did a poem crit!
>
> I saw no bad commentary, as a mod had already erased a troll attack.
>
> IN RETURN, I do now respectfully request that every PC member award
> http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/60825/
> with ten after ten after ten...no crits needed. The item is
> perfectly....
>
>
> PUCKISH!@!@*!^R#@!
>
> ha ha!
>
> Reid (eat my ambergris, anyone :)
|
| re: Now the vers squirms: R_Reid_Welch 1 Feb 10 12:08AM | Thread Closed |
QUOTE:
not gonna lie, this is shit. lay off the meds.
— Sequiturist [!]
-===
The above is from a seventeen year old loser.
I am sorry to report that I misjudged his character entirely.
He, apparently, just gave the item, "Parfume, the Poem",
a "one".
That's pretty sorry-assed.
May he now drown in his own spittle.
I won't retaliate in any way except to note how small he is,
very small, and he has no glasses...some fish is seeing better now,
than our young mist-her-S.
Good night, all.r
|
|---|
| Does everybody now agree, see that the rating system is wrong? R_Reid_Welch 1 Feb 10 12:13AM | Thread Closed |
It is wrong at basis and should be abolished.
It is used as a popularity contest, only.
The adjudicants (sp?) are not "worthy" or qualified, myself included,
to rate the DIVERSE numbers/types of poems here.
And worse, infantile, hormonal-enraged child-adults, and even children,
such as Semeiniquist, can DOWNRATE any poem, just to vent his/her (he's a she, I think), RAGE.
Fuck these people who use the ratings system to "punish" those who give them offence.
S: eat me. You are a loser for now.
THINK before you act again.
Or are you truly stupid?
r.
|
| The cold truth... R_Reid_Welch 1 Feb 10 12:37AM | Thread Closed |
http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/60825/
and he has the unmitigated gall to say:
not gonna lie, this is shit. lay off the meds.
— Sequiturist
-----
Fool. That poem is from my old list.
http://www.poetrycritical.net/read/27740/
It is about...nearly FOUR YEARS OLD.
There are no "meds" involved in that poem-item.
It is one of the most complex poems I've ever essayed.
It cannot be faulted by the likes of you.
YOU were a mere thirteen year old when it was written.
How dare you call it "shit". Yeah, go ahead. Be an assholio.
I am so sorry that I tried to mentor an apparent IDIOT = YOU.
Curl up and fall off a boat and drown, for all I care.
You are a detriment to the world, at this time.
No one wants you here; that is: if you perish, I won't shed a tear.
Good bye and sweet dreams of sinking in freezing water.
You...a boater...and you can't even float. What a fool.
r. who can SWIM, and has, for over fifty years.
PSsss:
You won't see thirty, not at the rate you are sinking your own life, Semensucker.
Sorry for you, little boy. Study in school, hang out with friends, if you have any.
You don't fit in here, at all.
I am a gentle person, generally. You've just opened up my Celtic can of VERS.
Am averse to you now, forever.
|
|---|
1 2 | Next
|
|